Some
readers may think I am an alarmist. As you read this, join me in understanding
“fundamental change” in America, a stated objective of this U.S. president.
Direct
your attention to the March 16, 2012, Executive Order (EO) from the White House
titled “National Defense Resources Preparedness.” Read the 10 pages that you
can findhere.They can be viewed
as either appropriate national planning or a replay of events in Germany over
several years leading up to war beginning in September 1939. It all depends on
whether you trust the U.S. federal government or not. Polls show that the
majority of Americans do not.
Part II,
Section 201 states that the EO will “promote the national defense” and delegate
aspects of that need to Secretaries of Agriculture in regards to food, Energy
in regards to energy, etc. The government already has organizations and
structures in place that have been operating for decades to achieve all of
this, so the litany is superfluous. The EO states (Part III, Section 306) that
government will provide for “modification or expansion of privately owned
facilities” of financial and industrial institutions related to those mentioned
functions and agencies described earlier. Part VIII lists all those functions
covered to include civil transportation, energy, farm equipment, food resources
and facilities, health, defense, strategic and critical materials, and water
resources. In its convoluted manner of writing, the EO provides authority in
Part III to nationalize and change things under the aegis of “Expansion of
Productive Capacity and Supply.” It is evident to any common-sense thought that
this EO is a tactical document setting the stage for control, but it is totally
silent on events, conditions or mechanisms to trigger use.
The
EO labors through citations and establishes Advisory Committees, an executive
reserve corps and chain of command within agencies that make recommendations to
the President. This is totally unnecessary because these items and more are
already provided by the Defense Production Act and numerous other existing
laws. To complicate things, this EO revokes EO 12919 of June 3, 1994, and
Sections 401(3) and (4) of EO 12656 of Nov. 18, 1988, which covers the same
ground. Why it does so is an important question.
It
is a valid consideration to explore how and why this EO is an improvement on
current contingency planning regarding national defense. Such means exist and
are used daily by executive agencies of federal government. State and local
governments have and use similar plans. Sparse public discussion has examined
why this EO is needed or why it is better than how defense preparedness is done
without it.
It
is a valid consideration whether Congress should be a concurring party to
implement activation of this EO, much the same as declaration of war requires
concurrence by Congress (something that the present Administration has ignored,
although required by the Constitution). Notice that the public has not heard
any comments or objections by members of either the House or Senate that this
new EO is excessive without oversight or concurrence. Congress cannot override
an EO, but it can pass legislation declaring an EO unconstitutional. (The
Supreme Court can declare an EO unconstitutional but rarely has.) The
legislature’s silence is curious and prompts questions of why no member of Congress
has expressed concern over the President’s establishment of means to declare a
totalitarian state by fiat.
It
is valid to wonder why the mass media has been silent on questions that affect
every citizen and every business in this country. The cited EO is essentially
the same as what was in effect. But it has the signature of this President,
supporting evidence of his narcissism. Consider the history of other “leaders”
who have suffered from this condition.
What
is stated here is one of many examples of our nation headed in the wrong
direction. Both the Legislative branches (all House and Senate members) and the
Chief Executive in the White House should be replaced in the coming elections
this November. It is time to restart federal government processes that are
needed to allow American private citizens and business people to guide a
restructuring of our nation. Time is short.IH
Report Abusive Comment