This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn MoreThis website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
Some of the biggest management challenges facing the metals industries are driven by customers rather than regulators. Recently, Ford, General Motors and Toyota have announced that they will require their first tier suppliers to comply with the ISO 14000 standard for Environmental Management Systems. Most, if not all, metals industries have adopted environmental management practices for operating their production facilities, maintaining their control equipment, and monitoring their compliance status. However, the metals industries have not embraced a standard set of environmental management practices with the same widespread enthusiasm as the chemical industry has adopted the "Responsible Care" program.
Also, the metals industry management systems designed to demonstrate compliance with federal, state and local regulations will not necessarily satisfy the requirements of ISO 14000. The jump to ISO 14000 compliance may therefore be troublesome for many affected metals industries companies. One benefit for these companies is that most of them are already certified under ISO 9000 guidelines, and so the documentation aspects of complying with 14000 will not be entirely new.