This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn MoreThis website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
Coal is number one when it comes to the U.S. power-generation industry-more than 50% of electricity produced in the U.S. is generated by coal-fired power plants. This is good news except that the contribution of CO2 emissions from fossil fuels to global warming has the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency continually increasing restrictions on emissions from power plants.
Coal is number one when it comes to the U.S. power-generation industry-more than 50% of electricity produced in the U.S. is generated by coal-fired power plants. The plants are less costly to build than nuclear power plants and there's less safety risk involved. And with an estimated 250 years of coal reserves in the U.S., it's likely than new plants will be coal fired. This is good news except that the contribution of CO2 emissions from fossil fuels to global warming has the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency continually increasing restrictions on emissions from power plants. We need to find ways to overcome this dilemma, and there are signs of moving in that direction.