- HOME
- MAGAZINE
- FEATURES
- TOPICS
- Ceramics & Refractories/Insulation
- Combustion & Burners
- Heat Treating
- Heat & Corrosion Resistant Materials/Composites
- Induction Heat Treating
- Industrial Gases & Atmospheres
- Materials Characterization & Testing
- Melting/Forming/Joining
- Process Control & Instrumentation
- Sintering/Powder Metallurgy
- Vacuum/Surface Treatments
- COLUMNS
- DIRECTORIES
- RESOURCES
- MULTIMEDIA
- EVENTS
- BLOG
Welding
is a very important joining process and has been used extensively for at least
the past 60 years. Like most processes, there is a need to control welding and ensure
a high-quality end result. Over the years, there have been many spectacular
failures of welded structures that emphasize this need. Many procedures
involving nondestructive and destructive tests are used to study weldments. Metallographic
examination can be performed by grinding a spot on the surface of a weld, its
heat-affected zones or nearby base metal (the metal being joined that was
unaffected by the heat of the welding process). This is a reasonably
nondestructive evaluation. However, destructive examination, where a specimen is
removed from either the welded assembly or test coupons, is quite commonly
performed. Test coupons are often used to qualify the welder and ensure that
the techniques and materials chosen will produce a weld with acceptable
soundness and mechanical properties. Post mortems of failed weldments are also
examined metallographically using sections removed from the welded assembly,
generally after nondestructive examinations are completed.
In some cases, the welded structure is large and, in the case of a field failure, a section must be removed by flame cutting. This process produces a substantial damaged zone adjacent to the cut, perhaps as large as 10-15 mm. When the section gets to the laboratory, the damaged cut region must be removed by a less-damaging cutting method, such as band sawing or abrasive sectioning. Then the metallographer will cut out coupons using a laboratory abrasive cut-off saw that introduces less damage than production manufacturing equipment. Weld samples often tend to be large and irregular in shape. Many will not fit within a standard 1-, 1.25-, 1.5- or 2-inch (25-, 30-, 40- or 50-mm) diameter mold for compression molding. In such cases, the metallographer often builds a mold using bent sheet metal (coated perhaps with a mold-release agent), places the specimen inside this mold (after the mold is glued to a suitable base plate) and encapsulates the specimen with epoxy resin. After it has cured, the specimen can be ground and polished using a wide variety of semi-automated equipment.
Next time, we will take a look at the microstructure of the weld.
In some cases, the welded structure is large and, in the case of a field failure, a section must be removed by flame cutting. This process produces a substantial damaged zone adjacent to the cut, perhaps as large as 10-15 mm. When the section gets to the laboratory, the damaged cut region must be removed by a less-damaging cutting method, such as band sawing or abrasive sectioning. Then the metallographer will cut out coupons using a laboratory abrasive cut-off saw that introduces less damage than production manufacturing equipment. Weld samples often tend to be large and irregular in shape. Many will not fit within a standard 1-, 1.25-, 1.5- or 2-inch (25-, 30-, 40- or 50-mm) diameter mold for compression molding. In such cases, the metallographer often builds a mold using bent sheet metal (coated perhaps with a mold-release agent), places the specimen inside this mold (after the mold is glued to a suitable base plate) and encapsulates the specimen with epoxy resin. After it has cured, the specimen can be ground and polished using a wide variety of semi-automated equipment.
Next time, we will take a look at the microstructure of the weld.



More


With access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,




