# Featured Event: 8th Vacuum Carburizing Symposium May 6-7, hosted by ALD-Holcroft

## Subscription Customer Service

May 6, 2013
 KEYWORDS combustion / Excel workbook Email / Print / Reprints / More / Text Size+

There are at least two ways to describe a furnace’s thermal performance. The percent-available heat[1] indicates thermal efficiency, while the adiabatic flame temperature[2] indicates heat-transfer intensity. Both factors can be used to indicate a furnace’s productivity.

The combustion heat initially shows up as sensible heat in the combustion products. The adiabatic flame temperature (AFT) is the highest-attainable flame temperature before any appreciable heat has been transferred to the charge. Heat is transferred from the combustion gas to the charge mainly by radiation, which is proportional to the 4th power of temperature.[3]

Clearly, the higher the AFT, the more effective the flame is in transferring heat to the furnace contents. The calculated AFT is never attained in practice but is closely approached when combustion is rapid, and the flame does not directly impinge on the furnace contents or walls. The AFT is mainly used to compare changes in thermal intensity for different combustion settings (i.e. type of fuel, % excess air, oxygen enrichment, etc.). Here we show how to make an AFT calculation for methane (CH4) burned with 40% excess air.

## Calculation Procedure

Figure 1 shows the three steps for calculating an AFT. Please download workbook AFT-Calc.xlsx, which has details of this example and handles several fuels at variable “% excess air.” The heat effects of steps 1 and 2 are easily calculated using techniques from earlier columns.[4,5] However, a different procedure is required for the heat effect of step 3. To illustrate, we show the AFT calculation when air enters at 38°C (100˚F) and methane enters at 20˚C (68˚F).

Table 1 displays the relevant enthalpy data obtained from FREED.[6] Table 2 displays the amounts of reactants and products.[1] When reactants enter at temperatures between 0˚ and 100˚C, we can use their Cp instead of quadratic enthalpy equations. For normal air, Cp = 29.16 J/g-mole-deg, and for CH4, Cp = 36.0 J/g-mole-deg.

Equations 1a and 1b show the heat effects for step 1, and Equation 2 is the DH˚comb for methane (step 2). The algebraic sum of these terms must equal the value of step 3 (+807,200 J), which is the HAFTH25 of the combustion gas.

Cool 13.33 moles of air from 38-25˚C: H25H38 = 13.33(29.16)(25 – 38) = –5,050 J  [1a]

Heat one mole of CH4 from 20˚-25˚C: H25H20 = 36(25 – 20) = +180 J            [1b]

Fuel combustion: CH4 + 2O2 ’ CO2 + 2H2O(g); DH˚comb at 25°C = –802,330 J.           [2]

The heat-content equation for each Table 1 species was multiplied by the species amount (Table 2). Equation 3 shows the sum of the combined terms set to zero. The quadratic formula[7] was used to calculate the AFT.

0.02430(T2) + 488.25T – 847,800 = 0; AFT = 1608˚C                   [3]

The workbook at www.industrialheating.com/AFT-Calc.xlsx does all this arithmetic and more, and you can customize it for your situation.

## Theoretical vs. Actual (Equilibrium) AFT

The AFT calculated in Equation 3 is called the theoretical AFT because it assumes that the combustion products are entirely CO2 and H2O. Above about 1650˚C, however, there is significant equilibrium disproportionation of CO2 and H2O to other gases, plus the formation of NO(g). The workbook shows the difference between the theoretical and actual AFT. This will be the subject of a later article. IH

## References

1. Arthur Morris, “Available Combustion Heat,” Industrial Heating, May 2013

2.  Wikipedia contributors, “Adiabatic flame temperature,” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, March 2013 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adiabatic_flame_temperature

3. Wikipedia contributors, “Thermal radiation,” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, March 2013. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_radiation.

4.  Arthur Morris, “Calculating the Heat of Combustion of Natural Gas,” Industrial Heating, September 2012

5.  Arthur Morris, “Making a Heat Balance,” Industrial Heating, December 2012

6. www.thermart.net.

7.   Wikipedia contributors, “Quadratic equation,” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, March 2013. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_equation.

## Exothermic Atmospheres

May 8, 2013
DEAR SIR-MADAM, THE WORKBOOK LINK DOES NOT WORK. PLEASE CAN YOU SEND ME THIS DOCUMENT VIA E-MAIL.

May 8, 2013
The workbook link has been fixed.

## Image Galleries

### 2013 Product Roundup

The Product Roundup is a showcase of some of the best products and technologies the thermal-processing industry has to offer.  Industrial Heating has rounded up these advanced, energy-efficient and cost-effective items in one special section  for easy reference.

## Podcasts

This month’s discussion focuses on deep freezing and cryogenic treatment. Sponsored by:

More Podcasts

## 2014 March

Come check out the latest Industrial Heating publication with a special feature on the calculation of heat-treating costs!

### Social Network and Forum Poll

If a new industry social network and forum was established, how much would you use it?
Poll Archive

### THE INDUSTRIAL HEATING STORE

Everyday Metallurgy

If you have ever wished there was something people could read to help them better understand what you do, this is the book for you.

More Products

### Clear Seas Research

With access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.