Industrial Heating Magazine
 Home
 Subscribe
 eNews Subscribe
 Subscription Customer Service
 Searchable Directories
 In This Issue
 Features
 Columns
 Industry News
 Products
 Tech Literature
 Online Resources
 Webinars
 Archives
 The Experts Speak Blog
 IH TV
 Podcasts
 White Papers
 Classified Ads
 Industry Links
 Market Research
 Web Search Power Pages
 FORGE Magazine
 IH Info
 Media Kit
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Greenhouse Gas Reporting (Part 2)
by Richard J. Martin
December 17, 2009

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare

Rick Martin<br>
Rick Martin


Holding Steady

Although no federal GHG regulations currently exist, EPA reports that nationwide CO2 emissions have risen very little in the 2000s. As noted in the table, CO2 has increased only about 2% over the first eight years of the decade and has gone down significantly in the metallurgical-industry segments shown. Evidence suggests that the U.S. production of these metals has also decreased, but the CO2 reductions are about two to three times greater than the declines in material output, indicating that these sectors have achieved significant energy-efficiency improvements.


Applicability

To help facilities determine whether the new reporting rules apply to their operations, EPA developed a simple flowchart, which is reproduced to the left.

The chart cites three tables that identify manufacturing processes and equipment that typically emit GHG. The source categories listed in Table 1 include aluminum, cement and titanium-dioxide production. Table 2 categories include ferroalloy, glass, iron and steel, lead, and zinc production. The combustion units cited in Table 3 include boilers, process heaters, gas turbines and “other stationary fuel-combustion equipment.”

Monitoring

EPA has also set up four “tiers” by which companies can compute CO2 emissions. These include company records of fuel usage, direct measurements of fuel consumption and continuous emission-monitoring systems (CEMS) for CO2. Not all tiers are applicable to all facilities at all times, so the rule should be reviewed for applicable details.

Facilities must not only submit their 2010 GHG report before March 31, 2011, but they also will be required to retain supporting records for at least three years. Records to be retained include lists of GHG-emitting unit operations, raw data used to compute GHG emissions, a data monitoring plan and maintenance records for monitoring instruments.

The EPA website is still being populated with information as the commencement of required reporting grows nearer. To remain current, readers are encouraged to check it periodically at www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ghgrulemaking.html.


Richard J. Martin
rmartin@martinthermal.com

  Comments (2)Post a Comment
Title: CO2 missions v. AGW?


Dear Richard, you did not mention it but your article implies (at least to me) their is much concern about CO2 emissions and why? ...must be global warming related, right? CO2 is only ~3-4% of GHG (water vapor 94-96%) and less than 0.04% of our atmosphere. ALL manmade CO2 from ALL fossil fuel only contributes about 4% to CO2 levels. Most, as best we know, comes from the oceans (~70% of the earths surface)releasing CO2 as they warm and absorbing as they cool. But gee, I think you already know this... if not please go do your homework and be enlightened, the earth's warming is primarily due to sun activity (very active '75-'99 and almost nil 2000-'09).


Title: CO2 Emissions Reporting and Global Warming


Reply to Chris M. - The purpose of this column/blog was to alert users of heating equipment about a new EPA requirement for GHG reporting. It was not an opinion piece – it was informational.
Please read my IH columns for January and February 2010 where I review a book by Dr. Donald Rapp on the subject of Global Warming.
I concur with your assessment that the earth did warm from 1975 to 1999 and has not warmed since, but I don't think the link to solar activity has been proven. Also, while I concur the oceans are a major reservoir for CO2, the fact that CO2 has continued to rise for >100 years, irrespective of global temperature rising and falling, indicates that some fraction of CO2 is likely human caused. Bottom line however, is that the "Climate Scientists" have failed to prove any significant connection between observed temperature rises and man-made CO2.


 
 

BNP Media
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy