Industrial Heating Magazine


 Home
 Subscribe
 eNews Subscribe
 Subscription Customer Service
 FORGExpo
 Searchable Directories
 In This Issue
 Features
 Columns
 Industry News
 Products
 Tech Literature
 Online Resources
 Webinars
 FORGExpo
 Archives
 The Experts Speak Blog
 IH TV
 Podcasts
 White Papers
 Classified Ads
 Industry Links
 Market Research
 FORGE Magazine
 IH Info
 Media Kit
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Effect of Surface Roughness of Parts to be Brazed
by Dan Kay
February 11, 2010

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



Extensive testing over the years in many places has shown that the best surface (generally speaking) for brazing is the "as-received" (as-rolled, as-drawn, as-machined, etc.) surface roughness of the material coming into the shop. This as-received surface may be 16 RMS, 32 RMS, 64 RMS, 125 RMS or even greater.

Surface roughness adds surface area to the joint, which provides countless extra capillary paths for brazing filler metal (BFM) to follow.

Additionally, and very importantly, it allows parts to be assembled without adding any "spacers" in between the surfaces to be brazed. But it allows so-called metal-to-metal contact between the parts being brazed. The surface roughness of the faying surfaces should be quite sufficient to allow BFM to flow through the gap between the surfaces that is created by the surface roughness of each component.

It is NOT RECOMMENDED to polish the metal surface prior to brazing. This can destroy capillary paths and, with metal-to-metal contact, could actually shut off capillary flow entirely.


Dan Kay
Dan Kay operates his own brazing consulting practice in Connecticut (since 1996) and has been involved in brazing for 35 years. He received his BS in Metallurgical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in 1966 and his MBA from Michigan State University in 1982.

  Comments (0)Post a Comment
 

No HTML or BBCode in comments please.
 







BNP Media

© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy