Industrial Heating Magazine


 Home
 Subscribe
 eNews Subscribe
 Subscription Customer Service
 FORGExpo
 Searchable Directories
 In This Issue
 Features
 Columns
 Industry News
 Products
 Tech Literature
 Online Resources
 Webinars
 FORGExpo
 Archives
 The Experts Speak Blog
 IH TV
 Podcasts
 White Papers
 Classified Ads
 Industry Links
 Market Research
 FORGE Magazine
 IH Info
 Media Kit
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
The Nuclear Renaissance: Opportunities for the Heat-Treating Industry
by Daniel H. Herring
June 2, 2010

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare

“The choice is not if we are willing to be in the midst of a nuclear revival, the choice is what to do about it now that we are.”
- The Nuclear Option, CNBC, June 2009


State of the Industry

Enlarge this picture
Fig. 1. World net eectricity consumption by region, 2010-2025 (billion kilowatt-hours)[1]
The reality around the globe is that nuclear energy is here to stay not necessarily because we’re convinced it is the best option, that it does not carry with it short- and (very) long-term consequences or it is easy, but because it is the most sustainable energy source capable of meeting near-term energy demands (Fig. 1). In most countries concerns over safety, pollution in the form of waste and proliferation continue to create controversy as to how and when to proceed.

In March 2007, for the first time in more than three decades, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission granted an Early Site Permit (ESP) for a new nuclear power plant. The ESP is the first stage toward a new plant and allows Exelon Generation Company to start construction work in Clinton, Ill., to determine if the site is suitable for a nuclear power plant. This is the first permit granted under a new licensing process that was established in 1989 but had not previously been used. The initial application was filed in September 2003. Decisions on two other plant applications are expected in early 2010 with another pending application still in the early stages.


Enlarge this picture
Fig. 2. World energy usage by type and region
In the U.S. alone, nuclear energy has the potential to supply 40-50% of the country’s total energy demand for the next 40-60 years. These figures include the expected 21% energy growth in the U.S. by 2030. Worldwide, nuclear energy has the potential to supply as much as 20% of the world’s energy needs. Nuclear energy along with renewable energy will have the greatest impact on reducing our dependence on oil, natural gas and coal (Fig. 2).


Enlarge this picture
Fig. 3. Number of nuclear reactors in operation by country – June 2009
As of June 2009, there are 436 nuclear power plants in operation in 31 countries (Fig. 3) with an installed electric net capacity of nearly 370 GW and 48 plants in 15 countries with additional installed capacity of another 42 GW under construction (Table 1).


In its March 2009 report, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) significantly increased its projection of world nuclear generating capacity. It now anticipates at least 70 new plants in the next 15 years, with up to 750 GW in place by 2030 – much more than projected in 2000 and over 100% more than actually produced in 2008. The change is based on specific plans and actions in a number of countries, including China, India, Russia, Finland and France, coupled with a change in outlook due in part to the Kyoto Protocol. This would give nuclear power a 17% share in electricity production in 2020, up from the present day figure of 6% (Fig. 4). The fastest growth continent for implementation of nuclear energy is Asia.


Enlarge this picture
Fig. 4. World energy usage by type
In addition, 16 countries with existing nuclear power programs (Argentina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, France, Russia, China, India, Pakistan, Japan, Romania, Slovakia, South Korea, South Africa, Ukraine, U.S.) have plans to build new power reactors beyond those now under construction.

In all, over 100 power reactors with a total net capacity of almost 120,000 MW are planned and over 250 more are proposed. Rising energy prices and environmental (greenhouse) constraints have combined to put nuclear power back on the agenda for projected new capacity in both Europe and North America with Asian capacity growing rapidly to keep pace with their fast growing energy demands.


Brief Overview of Nuclear Power

Enlarge this picture
Fig. 5. Nuclear fission reaction
To provide the power for an electric generator, nuclear power plants rely on the process of nuclear fission. In this process, the nucleus of a heavy element, such as uranium, splits when bombarded by a free neutron in a nuclear reactor. The fission process for uranium atoms yields two smaller atoms, one to three free neutrons and an amount of energy (Fig. 5). Because more free neutrons are released from a uranium fission event than are required to initiate the event, the reaction can become self-sustaining, creating the familiar chain reaction under controlled conditions and yielding a tremendous amount of energy.

In the vast majority of the world's nuclear power plants, heat energy generated by burning uranium fuel is collected in ordinary water and is carried away from the reactor's core either as steam in boiling-water reactors (BWR) or as superheated water in pressurized-water reactors (PWR).

Boiling-water and pressurized-water reactors are so-called light-water reactors because they utilize ordinary water to transfer the heat energy from reactor to turbine in the electricity generation process. In other reactor designs, pressurized heavy water, gas or other cooling media transfers the heat energy.


Enlarge this picture
Fig. 6. Boiling water reactor
Boiling Water Reactor (BWR)
In a typical commercial boiling-water reactor (Fig. 6) the sequence of events are: (1) the reactor core creates heat; (2) a steam-water mixture is produced when very pure water (reactor coolant) moves upward through the core, absorbing heat; (3) the steam-water mixture leaves the top of the core and enters two stages of moisture separation, where water droplets are removed before the steam is allowed to enter the steam line; and (4) the steam line directs the steam to the main turbine, causing it to turn the turbine generator, which produces electricity. The unused steam is exhausted to a condenser where it is returns to liquid form. The resulting water is pumped out of the condenser with a series of pumps, reheated, and pumped back to the reactor vessel. The reactor's core contains fuel assemblies that are cooled by water, which is force circulated by electrically powered pumps. Emergency cooling water is supplied by other pumps that can be powered by onsite diesel generators. Other safety systems, such as the containment cooling system, also need electric power.


Enlarge this picture
Fig. 7. Pressurized-water reactor
Pressurized-Water Reactor
In a typical commercial pressurized-water reactor (Fig. 7) the sequence of events are: (1) the reactor core generates heat; (2) pressurized-water in the primary coolant loop carries the heat to the steam generator; (3) inside the steam generator, heat from the primary coolant loop vaporizes the water in a secondary loop, producing steam; and (4) the steam line directs the steam to the main turbine, causing it to turn the turbine generator, which produces electricity. The unused steam is exhausted to the condenser where it returns to liquid form. The resulting water is pumped out of the condenser with a series of pumps, reheated and pumped back to the steam generator. The reactor’s core contains fuel assemblies that are cooled by water, which is force-circulated by electrically powered pumps. Emergency and other safety systems are similar to those in a boiling-water reactor.


Enlarge this picture
Fig. 8. Pressurized heavy water reactor (PHWR)
Pressurized Heavy Water Reactor (PHWR)
This design is also called the CANDU reactor (Fig. 8) because it originated in Canada. It is very similar to the PWR with respect to the pressure system. However, the main difference is that these reactors use natural uranium as the fuel. There is, therefore, not a lot of fissionable U235 in the fuel, so a moderator is needed to control the speed of the neutron fission products. As many neutrons as possible are required to bombard the limited U235 in order to continue the fission chain reaction. Light water, though it slows down neutrons efficiently, also has a tendency to absorb the neutrons. These reactors therefore use heavy water (deuterium oxide, D2O or 2H2O) as the moderator. Deuterium oxide is less likely to absorb neutrons because deuterium already has twice the amount of neutrons as the hydrogen in light water. However, a large quantity of heavy water is needed to have an influence on the neutron speed. Another disadvantage of heavy water is that if it absorbs neutrons it produces the radioactive isotope of hydrogen called tritium. Though heavy water is expensive, costs are cut down by use of natural uranium. Furthermore, the PHWR can be refueled while in operation.


Enlarge this picture
Fig. 9. Gas-cooled reactors (GCR)
Gas-Cooled Reactors (GCR)
Gas-cooled reactors are of European origin (Fig. 9). The coolant is carbon dioxide (CO2), and the moderator is graphite. Carbon dioxide is an effective coolant because it can be heated to high temperatures and can thus maximize heat transfer to the steam-generation process. Also, because it is gaseous, CO2 will not absorb the neutrons that are involved in the fission chain reaction. Gases are poor moderators, however, so graphite is needed because it is inexpensive, readily available and not damaged by high temperatures. The thermal efficiency of these reactors is very high but the fuel efficiency is low.


Enlarge this picture
Fig. 10. Light water graphite reactors
Light Water Graphite Reactors (LWGR)
The Light Water Graphite Reactor is a Soviet invention (Fig. 10). It was uniquely designed to generate power and produce plutonium. The coolant is light water and the moderator is graphite. This coolant/moderator combination is unique to the LWGR. The light water vaporizes as it passes through the reactor core. This steam is used to drive the turbines. A major advantage of the LWGR is that it can be refueled while in operation.


Valves (Pressure, Steam, Safety)

Enlarge this picture
Fig. 18. PWR valve locations
The main steam system used in any power plant provides steam from the source (reactor) to the turbine. The system normally has several other functions:
  • To provide the ability to prevent over-pressurization of the steam source (if the source puts out more heat than the turbine can accept)
  • To provide the ability to prevent overcooling of the reactor coolant system (if the steam system draws off more heat than the source can provide)
The major components in most main steam systems are:
  • Reactor steam line (BWR), steam generator (PWR) or Turbine Steam Separator (GCR).
  • Main steam isolation valve – usually an air-operated or motor-operated valve used to isolate the steam source from the turbine.
  • Safety valves – large relief valves that will open if steam pressure gets too high (same purpose as the pop valve on your hot water heater).
  • Power operated relief valves – large air or motor operated valves that usually lift at a setpoint lower than the safety valves – in order to keep the steam pressure from getting too high.
  • Non-return valve – a large valve that prevents backward steam flow in the steam line
Typical PWR components (Fig. 18):
  • Pressurizer safety relief (primary)
  • Main steam safety relief (powered)
  • Main steam safety relief (manual)
  • Main steam isolation
  • Main feedwater isolation
  • Heater drain flow control
  • Damped feedwater reverse flow check
  • Feedwater regulation
  • Aux-feedwater startup flow control
  • Steam driven aux-feed pump flow control
  • Chemical-injection flow control


Enlarge this picture
Fig. 19. BWR valve locations
Typical BWR components (Fig. 19):
  • Main steam isolation valve
  • Main steam safety relief
  • Damped feedwater reverse flow check
  • Residual heat removal low cooling control
  • Reactor core isolation cooling control
  • Reactor level flow control
  • Turbine bypass flow control
  • Feedwater pump recirculation control
  • Main feedwater regulation flow control
  • Feedwater water startup flow control
  • Low-pressure core spray flow control
  • High-pressure core injection flow control
  • Reactor-water cleanup flow control
  • Heater drain flow control


Daniel H. Herring
dherring@heat-treat-doctor.com
Dan Herring is president of THE HERRING GROUP Inc., which specializes in consulting services (heat treatment and metallurgy) and technical services (industrial education/training and process/equipment assistance. He is also a research associate professor at the Illinois Institute of Technology/Thermal Processing Technology Center.

References
1. Energy Information Administration (2004 Forecast) http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/nuclear/page/forecast/elec.html

2. International Atomic Energy Agency and World Nuclear Association (http://www.iaea.org/programmes/a2/index.html and http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/reactors.html) Updated: 2/09.

3. "Public Attitudes Toward America’s Energy Options: Insights for Nuclear Energy," MIT Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems, June 2007.

4. "A Nuclear Divide," IAEA Bulletin 50-1, September 2008.

5. "Japanese Nuclear Energy Policy and Public Opinion," The Center for International Political Economy and The James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy, May 2000.

6. Nova Machined Products Inc. (www.nova-nsa.com), private correspondence.

7. American Seal & Engineering (www.ameriseal.com), private correspondence.

8. Tsai, H., "Carbide and Nitride Nuclear Fuels," Encyclopedia of Materials Science and Engineering (1986), Michael B. Bever (Ed.), pp. 493-495

9. International Atomic Energy Agency (www.iaea.org)

10. Energy Information Administration (www.eia.doe.gov)

11. World Nuclear Association (www.world-nuclear.org)

12. Nuclear Energy Institute (www.nei.org)

13. The Nuclear Fuel Cycle, From Ore to Waste, P. D. Wilson (Ed.), Oxford Science Publications

14. Y.P. Lin and J. DeLuc, "On the effects of heat treatment and surface orientation on corrosion and hydrogen ingress of Zr–2.5Nb pressure tube material," Journal of Nuclear Materials, 1999.

15. Idaho National Laboratory/Nuclear Power Industry Strategic Plan for Light-Water Reactor Research and Development.


|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.






BNP Media

© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy